|

TOWN COUNCIL
WEBSITE
CHIPPY CLASSIFIEDS
LOCAL
CHIPPY NEWS
IS NOW HERE
All phone numbers on this site are code 01608 unless shown
otherwise.
OTHER CHIPPY WEB SITES
Comments, Ideas,
Criticisms, Articles
E-MAIL US
HOME
Finding us
A "secret"
road
Description
Map of Chippy
Stay in Chippy
Stay nearby
Holiday Cottages
Things to see
Chippy's Pubs
Pubs Nearby
Restaurants
Some History
LOCAL
NEWS PAGE
HOSPITAL
RECENT NEWS
WEATHER
TOWN DIARY
FORUM
TOWN INFO
Census Info
Bus & Rail
CLUBS &
SOCIETIES
TOWN COUNCIL
Appraisal
BUSINESS
DIRECTORY
OUR MP
LOCATIONS
DRINKING/EATING
SHOP LOCATIONS
HIGH ST/MIDDLE ROW
WEST ST
NEW ST /MARKET ST

GO TO
FORUM

Visit
the
Theatre website
CATCH UP
WITH
PREVIOUS
ARTICLES
NEWS STORY
INDEX
PEOPLE
YVONNE BARNES
ROBIN
SMITTEN
RALPH MANN
DON DAVIDSON
EVE COLES
JOHN HANNIS
THE VICAR
RONNIE
BARKER
FEATURES
ST MARY'S
CN
HOSPITAL
MANOR HOUSE
CHIPPY MARKET
REGULATED PASTURE
HENRY CORNISH
BURGAGE PLOTS
THE WHITE HART
CN BOWLS CLUB
CRAFT GALLERY
VINTAGE SPORTS CAR
CLUB
AVIATION
HISTORY
SKIES OVER
CHIPPY
CN AUSTRALIA
CREAMWARE
FAMILY
HISTORY
ONE
ARTIST & CN
JUBILEE
ANISH KAPOOR AT
ROLLRIGHT STONES
SHORT STORY BY
PETER BUCKMAN
PHOTO COMPETITION
POWER OF SNOW
ROUSHAM
SIMNEL CAKE
UP NORTH
ST VALENTINE
CUSTOMS
WHITBREAD
BOOK AWARDS
OLD SHOPS
REVIEWS
BY GEORGE
HUMMER
SINBAD
PICASSO
WOMEN OF OWU
TRIO
JACK & THE BEANSTALK
LA BOHEME
METAMORPHOSIS
TASTE
| |
|
GIVE US A BREAK! NO MORE HOMES UNTIL THERE ARE SOME
MORE JOBS IN THE TOWN |
When Parker Knoll closed
three years ago with the loss of 400 jobs and permission was given for 120
houses on the site, there was a fierce outcry that if the jobs and homes
in the town were not kept in some kind of balance, it was obvious that
Chippy would increasingly become a commuter place - dead during the day as
working folk headed off to Oxford, Banbury, Witney and even Swindon and
Cheltenham. The Planners solemnly promised us that five acres of land at
Parker Knoll would be developed as industrial units - and moreover Wimpey
would not be allowed to sell their homes until detailed marketing plans
for these units had been agreed and finalised. This has turned out to be
complete eyewash. Wimpey have been stalling the planners for three years
and no plans have been agreed as far as anybody knows. The employment land
is said to be under offer - for the third time. The whole thing is turning
into a scandal. Two years ago a Town Partnership was formed to get funding
for employment-generating schemes and to produce a marketing plan for the
town. Absolutely nothing has been done. When the Local Plan was reviewed
by an Inspector he refused to
allow
the allocation of Tank Farm (left) for residential use precisely
because this would adversely affect the homes/employment balance in the
town. Now Gleesons want to build 50 "affordable" homes there - claiming
its a windfall site and comes under the "rural exceptions" policy.
That policy was intended for "small scale" developments in villages - not
a huge development like the one proposed, which would extend the borders
of the town and wreck some attractive open countryside. But even more
importantly it continues this stupid cycle of more homes - fewer
jobs. Worse still is another application - just in - to build 24 flats at
Station Mill. Eighteen months ago permission was refused for the change of
use for the converted Mill owned by Solar Jewellery from an employment
site to residential. However in an attempt to help the firm's difficult
financial position they were granted permission to build some houses at
the back of the Mill with their assurance they would stay in commercial
operation in the town. But Solar simply sold up and left. Now the new
owner is back wanting to convert the old Solar building into
flats. This is a high density development with two separate blocks,
a courtyard and underground parking. All one and two bedroom flats with
40% affordable housing. But who needs more one bedroom affordable flats?
These haven't been in any demand by Chippy people at Blissfield Gardens.
What everybody seems to want is an affordable three-bedroom house with a
small garden. The developers say the old Solar building has been on the
market for eighteen months with no takers. (Only one company was
interested says the application. That was Ceta and as we all know they
were offered a cut price piece of land by the County Council). The
application also says astonishingly that it would be unviable to modernise
the old Mill as a commercial building. To be competitive it would have to
be converted into small scale IT-friendly units like the ones planned for
the Parker Knoll site. Great story - except who has guaranteed that
anything like that is actually going to be built at Parker Knoll. They
know more than we do. It is complete madness to go on building flats on
employment sites. More homes - fewer jobs. We must all resist this trend
as strongly as possible. Otherwise the character and vitality of the town
will be ruined for ever. |
|
MORE DELAY FOR ENTERPRISE
CENTRE |
TO GINA BURROWS; I am writing to
you as my representative on the Town Partnership.
It was stated at the Town Council on Monday that an answer was
expected at the Partnership Meeting yesterday
about plans for the sale and development of the five acres of employment
land at the Parker Knoll site. This would allow
the preparation of a grant application for an Enterprise Centre to go
ahead. I am sure you
are aware of how much interest and concern there is about this issue in
the town - particularly since we have been told on at least three
separate occasions over the last year that an
answer was expected within the next week or so.
I would like your reassurance that firm
imformation about the employment land
was forthcoming and I would be grateful if we
could be told what it was.
GERRY ALCOCK
TO GERRY ALCOCK:
At last night's meeting Will reported that negotiations were still
continuing between Wimpey and the potential buyer. They should have
exchanged in December but a legal problem arose and now their anticipated
exchange date is in February. This is hugely frustrating but is in the
hands of two sets of lawyers. Those representing the Partnership in this
and WODC are keeping the pressure on but there is a limit to what can be
done to move it further any faster. It seems both parties are keen to
complete but meanwhile this is immensely frustrating for us all and it is
understood how the patience of some of the community is being tried.
Nevertheless, other work concerned with the bid to the Market Towns fund
is being carried out so that we will be able to move straight on once
things are settled and Catherine Chater reported that she was meeting with
Brian Spragg who is overseeing the SEEDA money in Oxfordshire, that she
has the application form and is doing some of the preparatory work for the
bid. I'm afraid this will not constitute 'firm
information' but that is as firm as it gets at this point which is a
shame. It does seem to be a very long game.
GINA BURROWS
|
|
THIS ENTERPRISE CENTRE HAS BECOME A
SCANDAL
Whats the latest excuse? |
|
We are told that a grant application to
SEEDA for an Enterprise Centre is being held up because Wimpey have spent
the last year "trying" to sell the 5 acres of employment land on the
Parker Knoll site to another developer. Until this is finalised
nothing can be done. Despite this delay last September the Partnership
recruited a Programme Manager - at considerable cost - specifically to
make grant applications. She now seems to be twiddling her thumbs - very
expensively - so this whole matter has become urgent and now needs some
straight answers.
JAN 18th TO GINA BURROWS; I am
writing to you as my representative on the Town Partnership.
It was stated at the Town Council on Monday that an answer was
expected at the Partnership Meeting yesterday
about plans for the sale and development of the five acres of employment
land at the Parker Knoll site.
I am sure you are aware of how much interest
and concern there is about this issue in the
town - particularly since we have been told on at least three
separate occasions over the last year that an
answer was expected within the next week or so.
I would like your reassurance that firm information
about the employment land
was forthcoming and I would be grateful if we
could be told what it was.
GERRY ALCOCK
JAN 18th TO GERRY ALCOCK:
At last night's meeting Will reported that negotiations were still
continuing between Wimpey and the potential buyer. They should have
exchanged in December but a legal problem arose and now their anticipated
exchange date is in February. This is hugely frustrating but is in the
hands of two sets of lawyers. Those representing the Partnership in this
and WODC are keeping the pressure on but there is a limit to what can be
done to move it further any faster. It seems both parties are keen to
complete but meanwhile this is immensely frustrating for us all and it is
understood how the patience of some of the community is being tried.
I'm afraid this will not constitute 'firm information' but that is
as firm as it gets at this point which is a shame. GINA
BURROWS
18th MARCH TO GINA BURROWS Sorry to keep on about this
but I would like an answer.
On January 18th you wrote to me in connection
with Wimpey's sale of 5 acres of employment
land at Parker Knoll........" now their anticipated exchange date is in
February" It is now the middle
of March. Can you please tell me what has
happened?
GERRY ALCOCK
Monday morning.......No
reply yet from Gina but Hilary Biles has let us have her
comments..........I
too am hoping it will be sorted soon and that
we may get a positive announcement on Wednesday
...........
(presumably at the Partnership Forum. Well
lets hope so! If it happens it would be news manipulation with a
vengeance but it could still be worth turning up to this meeting to make
sure the announcement is actually made)
Gina responded later:
As far as I am aware the situation is as before - negotiations
are being carried out between commercial companies and progress is being
made. It is very frustrating for everyone not to have
more information and for the whole process to take so long but I'm sure
you and I are not alone in feeling this frustration.
Hopefully, when things are resolved, there will be something to
celebrate. In the meantime we just have to trust and be patient.
I told the mayor that my patience was exhausted and I had no basis
whatsoever for trusting the District Council.
Then Hilary rang to say
she didn't know anything either. She was only "hoping" for an
announcement. Suspicions mounted at the Town Council meeting when all
the Tory County and District councillors failed to turn up. Some of us
reckoned they must be holding a "spin" meeting somewhere to try and work
out how they were going to persuade the town that a Tesco supermarket
was yet another masterpiece of Conservative planning. This would all be
funny if it wasn't Chippy jobs we were talking about!
Needless to say there was no announcement about any of this at the
Partnership Meeting on Wednesday
|
|
Psst.....TESCO ARE COMING |
|

A fellow councillor rang
me up to tell me that he had heard from another councillor (who generally
knows about these things) that there's a really strong rumour around town
that Tesco have bought the 5 acres of employment land at the Parker Knoll
site. Its not surprising that as the District Council Planners keep
failing to deliver any definite news about what is happening the rumour
mill will take over. This one started when a local business man who would
rather like to set up a car showroom on London Road called in at the
Wimpey Site Office to enquire when units would be available. No chance he
was told. The employment land has been sold to Tesco. Its over three years
since the original planning permission was given. This involved Wimpey
having to produce a detailed marketing plan for industrial units on the 5
acres. We were told that marketing of the Wimpey houses could not proceed
until this plan was all tied up. (hmmm) It now seems that the only
marketing plan Wimpey ever had was to sell the land on to somebody else.
We have been told that any new owner would have to accept the plan
for industrial units agreed with Wimpey. The story goes that there is an
eager buyer but negotiations have been dragging on because of legal
problems (see below). What the rumour mill now says is that Tesco have
bought the land and will spend a year proving there is no demand for
industrial units. Then the planning permission expires and Tesco will
re-apply this time for "retail" use - which is perfectly OK. They will
claim they are creating 100 jobs. They will probably also sweeten their
application with an offer to build (or at least contribute a few million
towards) a link road from London Road, through Tank Farm and the School to
join up with Burford Road (the so-called Eastern By-Pass mentioned in the
County Transport Review). There is then a huge quantity of land ready for
residential in-filling between the new link road and the existing town
boundary - owned by Oxfordshire County Council with options already sold
to developers. The cash registers will be ringing out for everybody.
Lovely jubbly. The first application for residential development at Tank
Farm has already been made. Our town centre will end up like Stow - full
of shops selling pots and casserole dishes. It is absolutely vital that we
receive reassurance about these 5 acres of employment land as a matter of
great urgency. We want the employment units which were promised - not a
Tesco supermarket. |
|
GREAT NEWS ABOUT THE 5 ACRES
OF EMPLOYMENT LAND AT PK |
|
Excellent news that
Wimpey have at last exchanged contracts on the 5 acres of land allocated
for employment at the Parker Knoll site. Chunky Townley tells us in the
Forum that the site is being purchased by Starleen Investments
Limited, administered by Standard Bank, Jersey, with the intention of
developing in the region of 85,000 sq. feet of B1 space.
Hopefully this will be a mix of industrial units and office space as
agreed three years ago in a detailed Marketing Plan submitted to the West
Oxfordshire planners. We are told that the development team already
have experience operating in West Oxfordshire through the development of
the Blenheim Office Park in Long Hanborough.
The Chipping Norton site will be marketed by
Meeson Williams who recently produced a review of
prospects for commercial property in Oxfordshire - including this
encouraging forecast.....The trend for relocations to less well
established business locations will continue. We believe that
opportunities still exist in some of the the secondary rural and market
towns which will continue to see an increase in occupier demand, such as
Faringdon, Carterton, Wantage, Thame, Chipping Norton and Woodstock. All
of these towns have the potential to provide a good business
infrastructure.
Now that this ownership
issue has been settled, it should at last be possible for an agreement to
be reached about premises on the site for a new Enterprise Centre and for
a proposal for grant funding to be submitted to SEERA. Congratulations to
the West Oxfordshire planners for coming through with their side of the
deal. Now its over to the Partnership to get cracking. |
|
PLANS FOR INDUSTRIAL UNITS HAVE NOW BECOME AN "OFFICE
PARK"
YET ANOTHER BROKEN PROMISE? |
|
In the
last few years I have sat through many discussions about the 5 acres of
employment land at Parker Knoll. There has never - in my view - been the
slightest doubt that what was being promised were "industrial units" and "
workshops". The marketing Plan agreed three years ago talked abut a "mix
of units". We were expecting places suitable for small engineering
companies, fabric and furniture makers , electronics designers - and - who
knows - even the odd Formula 1 component maker. After all, the whole point
was try and lure back to work in Chippy some of the skilled and
semi-skilled workers who had been left high and dry by the Parker Knoll
closure and to try and tap into the fantastic pool of skilled motor
engineering talent in the area. And in any case there was already plenty
of office space available at Cromwell Park.....and a distinct shortage of
office workers. Ceta could never recruit enough people.
Now a
design statement has appeared for the development of this employment land
- distributed yesterday at the Town Council. A few quotes: "An outline
planning application was made to redevelop this site for B1 use and in
particular Office use". (Section 1.2) "Provision of 3-storey buildings are
acceptable on the site" WODC Planning advice quoted (Section 7.1)
"It is proposed the new office park is designed...." (Section 11.1).
A plan
shows 14 square and rectangular buildings surrounded by car parking and
with no serious landscaping features densely packed into the site in a
grid. If they are to provide the proposed 86,000 sq feet of space
("necessary to be viable") there will probably need to be two or three
stories.
It looks as if what will be built is offices - pure and simple. Another
Cromwell Park but much less attractive and without the space between
buildings. Is this really what's planned? Perhaps the Partnership will
tell us on Wednesday evening (18th July). Is there really such a demand
for office space? The Town Partnership spent £10,000 on a
"feasibility" study for the site's development two years ago which
supposedly established levels of demand. That study has never been
published. Perhaps the time for publication has come.
Councillor Keith Greenwell writes:
1 Chipping Norton already has a surfeit
of office accommodation with space available on Cromwell Park and more
to become available once CETA relocate to their new premises. What is
required is small industrial premises that will foster small
businesses employing say up to 10 and providing jobs for the school
leavers who want practical, hands-on jobs. The sort of units that
exist in Kingham or Crawley Mill and have attracted specialist
businesses doing operations like 'light investment casting', 'classic
motor cycle restoration' and specialist woodworking.
2 The new business park needs to
compliment other business sites in the town. More offices are not
going to compliment existing business sites. Why are some of the ex
employees from PK that wanted to start upholstery businesses now using
small factory premises in places like the Wychwoods? Quite simply
because, when you ask them they tell you they would have preferred to
stay in Chippy but, there were no suitable premises available at rents
they could afford within CN. We have exported jobs and skills to other
areas of West Oxfordshire and nothing in this proposaL will bring them
back!
I consider that the Town
Council should make strong
representations to WODC on the above lines and press for planning
permission to be granted only when it includes industrial units.
|
CHIPPING
Norton's long awaited Enterprise Centre on the former Parker Knoll site is
closer to becoming a reality. Outline plans for
the centre, set to provide business incubation units plus facilities for
existing businesses in the town, are close to being finalised by
commercial developers Starleen Investments Ltd who bought the site last
year. These will then be submitted to West
Oxfordshire District Council and go out to public consultation.
Chipping Norton District Councillor Robert
Townley, who asked the council for an update on the plans, said he was
pleased progress was being made. "This will be
of great benefit to the town. We have been waiting for it for some time
and now it looks as though everything is falling into place. The centre
isn't exactly imminent, it'll take all of a year, but it will be a boost
to the town." The developers, the company is
administered by the Standard Bank of Jersey, are preparing a detailed
marketing plan for the centre, which could offer up to 85,000 sq feet of
space for small businesses. The centre could
include flexible workspace with a wide range of support services not just
for tenants but existing businesses too. |
|