|

GO TO
FORUM
VISITOR
INFORMATION
TOWN
COUNCILLORS
names and addresses
TOWN COUNCIL
WEBSITE
(archive)
CHIPPY CLASSIFIEDS
LOCAL
CHIPPY NEWS
IS NOW
HERE
All phone numbers on this site are code 01608 unless shown
otherwise.
OTHER CHIPPY WEB SITES
Comments, Ideas,
Criticisms, Articles
E-MAIL US
Finding us
A "secret" road
Description
Map of Chippy
Stay in Chippy
Stay nearby
Holiday Cottages
Things to see
Chippy's Pubs
Pubs Nearby
Restaurants
Some History
LOCAL
NEWS PAGE
BBC WEATHER
LOCAL WEATHER
STATION
TOWN
INFO
Census
Info
BUS &
RAIL
CLUBS & SOCIETIES
BUSINESS
DIRECTORY
OUR MP
LOCATIONS
DRINKING/EATING
Visit
the
Theatre Website

CATCH UP WITH
PREVIOUS
ARTICLES
NEWS STORY
INDEX
| |
Lorry
route scheme a monumental mistake?
|
A
PROPOSAL to create a lorry route through the middle of the site of an
ancient monument in the north Cotswolds is being considered as one way of
cutting pollution in the centre of Chipping Norton.
The proposed route would take HGVs between the A44 and the A3400
right through the middle of the 5,000-year-old Rollright Stones, one of
the country's foremost megalithic stone circles.
The proposal, which would include the widening of Cross Hands Lane through
the ancient site at an estimated cost of £5 million, is one of a number of
options being considered as part of an action plan to reduce traffic
pollution in Chipping Norton High Street and Horsefair.
Other proposals in the plan considered by
West Oxfordshire District Council cabinet members yesterday (wed), include
implementation of a system of traffic controls to push queues to the edge
of Chipping Norton, the removal of the A44 primary route status in favour
of forcing lorries to use alternative routes between Evesham and Oxford,
and measures to stop motorists leaving engines of stationary vehicles
idling. A proposal to build a Chipping Norton
bypass either north or south of the town, at an estimated cost of between
£16.5 million and £36 million respectively, is not being put forward at
this stage. Neither is a suggested one-way
scheme to route traffic along Albion Street, which consultants say would
cut traffic in the High Street by 25 to 35 per cent at peak times but
double traffic using Albion Street.
The district council is having to look at
ways of reducing traffic emissions in the centre of Chipping Norton, which
currently fails to meet government targets for nitrogen dioxide levels.
But one of the most controversial proposals, which is likely to be
included in the list of possible options put out for public consultation
early next year, is certain to be the re-routing of HGVs between the A44
and the A3400 from the Cross Hands pub to east of the Rollright Stones.
Traffic consultants say this would only be feasible if the current
unclassified road, which already bissects the Rollright Stones site, was
widened from 5.5metres to 7.3metres. They also
say that the junctions at either end of the road would probably need
replacing with lit roundabouts. "The most
significant impact would be on the area of the Rollright Stones, a
Scheduled Ancient Monument," the district council's environment protection
and enforcement manager Philip Measures said in his report to councillors.
Karin Attwood, founder of the Rollright
Stones Trust, described the proposal as a "non-starter".
On both sides of the road you have scheduled monuments and because
of the scheduled monument status it would be extremely difficult, if not
impossible, to obtain planning permission. I
agree Chippy needs a bypass but it needs to be done at the bottom of the
valley not over the ridgeway," said Ms Attwood.
The Stones are considered to be a holy place by pagans, and druids
celebrate the summer solstice there every year.
Mr Measures said: "At the end of the day this is something that has been
developed by officers. Ultimately, it is for council members to decide." |
|
REPORT PROPOSES CONSULTATION
ON A ONE-WAY SYSTEM
(Just for the fun of it
imagine yourself driving a huge HGV down
the Banbury Road heading for Stow. Where will you get stuck?)
|
|

|
There is a huge new
report just published which must have cost tens of thousands to produce.
Its trying to find ways of reducing the pollution in Horsefair to
acceptable levels. In effect by reducing the number of HGVs going through
that bit of the High Street. Consultants (Halcrow and Jacobs), computer
models, traffic censuses - they're all in there. Its a serious sized file
at over 16 Mb and 100 pages long which will probably give your Adobe
Reader a severe case of indigestion. But try downloading it. Its worth a
read.
http://www.westoxon.gov.uk/files/reports/8240.pdf
The report dismisses a bypass (cost -
£16.5 million for an inner northern route and
£36.0 million
for an outer southern bypass),
throws out road user charging, and doesn't think anyone would cough up £11
million to compulsorily purchase all the houses in the Air Quality zone.
The report nods in the direction of Green Strategies, cleaner engines,
School Travel Plans and even suggests a new job for PCSOs - handing out
tickets to people who leave their engines running while stationary. A
lorry route via Cross Hands would mean widening the road and cost £4.95
million - as well as going slap through the Rollright Stones and needing
all kinds of special permissions. The report doesn't seem too optimistic
about the chances for such a scheme. There's the old standby - developing
alternative routes from Oxford to Evesham and signposting them (which is
already being done). The report does go one stage further and proposes
de-classifying the A44 and introducing weight restrictions through the
town. This looks by far and away the most likely way forward. Pity that
Halcrow say that the Police would probably not be able to enforce a weight
restriction. They don't say why not! One completely new idea will be
tested out. Its what they call "Queue Relocation". By introducing lights
at the top of New Street and at the mini roundabout by the Police Station,
the flow of traffic will be phased to ensure that there are no holdups in
Horsefair. (The phasing of lights on the Pedestrian Crossing in the square
will be co-ordinated into the scheme they say) What you presumably
do is to relocate the polluting queues of lorries to West Street, New
Street and the London Road. Which brings us back to the one really radical
idea in the whole report - a one way system. Pity it simply won't work!
Mainly because of the impossible traffic engineering required by the
Police Station (but perhaps that would go?) Besides which the huge amount
of extra traffic would bring West Street to a complete standstill. The
County and District plan to make presentations and carry out a
consultation exercise on all this this Wednesday and Saturday ( 27th
February and 1st March) so everyone will be able to have their say. If
you've got any bright ideas speak now or...... |
Diverting
heavy lorries past Rollright Stones
"crazy."
By David Horne
|
Plans
to take heavy lorries out of the centre of an Oxfordshire town, by
diverting them past an ancient stone circle, have been labelled "crazy."
The scheme to cut traffic in Chipping Norton by sending it along a country
road beside the Rollright Stones has surfaced in an air quality action
plan to get rid of excessive traffic fumes in the west Oxfordshire town.
The plan is now out for public consultation. But
the chairman of the Rollright Trustees said they had not been formally
consulted and would resist it forcefully.
The scheme would see the road, which bisects the national
heritage site, widened to take HGVs.
It would link the A44 at the Cross Hands pub to the A3400 Oxford
to Stratford road, effectively creating a mini-bypass. It would cost close
on £5m, plus compulsory purchase of roadside land.
George
Lambrick (right), the trustees'
chairman, said: "The road goes right through the middle of a
significant ancient monument, one of the first 50 scheduled in
this country. "This proposal is
absolutely crazy, it's nutty, and it's the first we know of it.
We haven't been consulted at all.
We've had problems with vandalism at the stones. We certainly
don't need another form of it, with heavy lorries thundering
past. It's just going to wreck what
the site stands for. We will be objecting very strongly."
The site attracts thousands of
visitors a year. There are two groups of stones, the Whispering
Knights and King's Men and a single-standing King's Stone.
The scheme would need scheduled ancient monument consent
because of the heritage status of the prehistoric stones.
It is one of a range of proposals, drawn up by
consultants for West Oxfordshire District Council, which went on
public exhibition at Chipping Norton town hall.
The
town's Horsefair and High Street have nitrogen dioxide levels
from traffic significantly above recommended Government levels.
Town councillor and member of the A44 Action Group, which
campaigns to reduce heavy lorries using the route from Oxford
through to Evesham, Worcester and beyond, Eve Coles
(left), said the amount of traffic in the town was
and remains a key concern for residents.
She said: "I'm concerned that people have their say on
this. The levels are 50 per cent above what they should be and
something needs to be done. Everyone
has complained about all the heavy vehicles coming through the
town."
The report said alternative
traffic diversion schemes via bypasses to the south and north of
the town were out of the question, as they would be massively
expensive and take at least 10 years to deliver.
Cheaper alternatives include imposing weight restrictions
to divert heavy lorries out of the town centre on to other
routes and to control traffic with a gate to shift congestion to
the town outskirts. |
|
AIR QUALITY
PROPOSALS
BY-PASS? ONE WAY SYSTEM? WEIGHT LIMIT?
AFTER THE CONSULTATION WE NOW
AWAIT SOME RECOMMENDATIONS!
|
There
were two
public consultations on the town's draft air quality action plan on
February 27and March 1.
In case you missed the exhibition you can catch up with the options here:
www.westoxon.gov.uk/environment/Draftactionplan.cfm
Following
these public consultations,
the draft Action Plan will be agreed between West Oxfordshire District
Council and Oxfordshire County Council. It will be put to the Department
of the Environment Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) for final comment before
publication.
The Action Plan addresses nitrogen dioxide pollution in
Chipping Norton, caused largely by traffic and, in particular, Heavy Goods
Vehicles.
The plan, which is at a preliminary stage, has considered options
such as traffic management initiatives, and supporting initiatives to
reduce air pollution. A total of 28 options have been outlined and each
one has been appraised on their practicality and cost effectiveness, and
whether they show a significant improvement to air quality.
I asked an officer
from the County Council what kind of comments the public had made
about the options. He said that it was totally clear that people
didn't really care which option was chosen - just get rid of all the
heavy lorries. That was what everybody wanted.
But after all this
work and all the reports it seems that the problem has not been
cracked and there is not a viable solution in sight. Only three of the
options proposed are going to make any real difference to the volume of
HGVs through the town centre and all of those seem to have big problems
attached.
First the Cross Hands route. (Problem: Nobody seems to think that the
government will provide the millions required and nobody thinks that it
will be feasible to increase traffic through the Rollright Stones site.
The lobbying has already started!).
Second. The idea of
gates and controlling traffic flows so that "queueing" is removed from the
town centre. (Problem: You will end up with lorries queuing up New
Street!)
Third: New signage and
an "environmental" weight restriction through the town. (Problem:
Nobody seems to think that
"environmental"
weight restrictions can actually be enforced. Apparently any overweight
lorry will simply say that it was making a delivery - which is allowed.
You have to prove that a lorry went right through the town without making
a delivery. Not easy to do without eating up resources which nobody has -
least of all the Police).
The only practical
answer seems to be for everybody to lobby like mad to have the Cross Hands
route diverted around the Stones. It will cost millions more but at least
such a plan would probably get the support of the Rollright Trust who
would surely be pleased to have their site integrated again without any
sort of road running through it! The other idea which came up during the
consultation was for the Cross Hands route to be "one-way" - with A44
traffic from Oxford continuing to go through the town. This would involve
less road widening and so cost much less but still achieve a 50% reduction
in HGV's.
Meanwhile, if you haven't filled in a
questionnaire as part of the consultation process, pop into the Guildhall
and get a form. The more people that have their say the more likely we are
to get some meaningful outcome.
|
|
HASSLING HGVs - WILL IT WORK?
Its certainly worth a try! |
|

 |
|
Oxfordshire County
Council's Trading Standards carried out a four-hour vehicle
check on Thursday August 14th in Chipping Norton in response to
concerns over the number of HGVs driving through the town. The
team was joined by Thames Valley Police and the Vehicle Operator
and Services Agency (VOSA) as they stopped 34 vehicles along the
town's main road to check for weight and mechanical defects on
Thursday (August 14). Of
the 25 vehicles which were weighed, four were found to be
over-laden, resulting in two vehicles being prohibited from
continuing their journey and two drivers being warned. Route
maps and advice were also given to 14 HGV drivers in a bid to
persuade them to consider using alternative routes avoiding
Chipping Norton centre.
Just over a quarter of the
vehicles stopped (26 per cent) were found by VOSA to have some
form of mechanical defect. Faults included faulty brake
lights or no brake lights, loose front bumper, a defective
trailer and a tachograph operation offence.
Oxfordshire
County Council's Cabinet Member for Community Safety Judith
Heathcoat said: "We are very pleased with the results of
yesterday's operation. It is vital that drivers and hauliers get
the message that they are responsible for ensuring their vehicle
is roadworthy and not overloaded. We hope the operation has also
persuaded HGV drivers to consider the possibility of using
alternative routes which avoid the centre of Chipping Norton."
This new
initiative will hopefully be repeated. It has come about after
consistent pressure from the County Councillor Hilary Biles to
get some action to try and cut down on the weight of HGV traffic
through the town. The next major development will be the
publication of agreed recommendations on improving Air Quality -
due in early September.
EDITOR writes> It
is good to see that a report on this road check is featured
prominently on the industry website ROADTRANSPORT.com so perhaps
other drivers will notice!! |
|
FIVE YEARS ON AND NOTHING TO SHOW
ON AIR QUALITY. NOT A DICKY BIRD!
A report on Air Quality in Chipping Norton
was presented on 4th September 2008 to the Oxfordshire County
Council Cabinet Member for Transport. |
The
traffic in our town is horrendous and getting worse. The Air
Quality in the Town Centre is way below government standards. Five
years ago the Town Council proposed in a submission to the
Oxfordshire Transport Review that a weight limit should be
introduced through the town - to drastically reduce the number of
HGVs. (I know all about this because I wrote the submission). It
included the following statement:
"Chipping Norton Council are convinced that a
weight restriction plus an alternative lorry route around the town
remains the only viable answer".
Our proposal was not accepted because it was
claimed there was too much "local" traffic (exempt from a weight
limit) which would make policing impossible. The County's
consultants Halcrow (paid millions to carry out the review)
decided that we should rely instead on a signposting scheme
directing heavy goods traffic from Evesham to Oxford along an
alternative route via Northleach. The problem of the increasing
traffic on the A361 (Swindon to Banbury) was never addressed.
Gloucestershire County Council to their credit introduced this
signposting scheme. Oxfordshire said they hadn't got the money and
to this day have done nothing. In 2005 the area of Horsefair, High
Street and West Street was declared an AQMA (Air Quality
Management Area). Among other things this means that the County
and the District together have to come up with an Action Plan
telling the government how pollution levels are to be reduced to
meet the required limits. After three years of measurements,
surveys, another consultant brought in to advise, studies,
reports, consultations (remember the list of 50 ideas which the
District published earlier this year - including one-way systems
and gated flows?) a report was presented last week (4th September
2008) to the Oxfordshire County Council Cabinet Member for
Transport. Read the quite surprisingly short report here.
http://www.oxfordshire.gov.uk/content/public/Resources/hlpdownloads/XT/XT040908-06.htm
As you read it consider that the cost in fees, time
and resources to get this point must be at least hundreds of
thousands of taxpayers pounds. All the different ideas which had
been put forward and discussed during the consultation - including
by-passes of all shapes and sizes - were thrown out . All
the ideas that is except just one. A weight limit!
The key finding in this report
is:
"...the
option which appears to be the most suitable for inclusion in the
Action Plan are measures to control lorry passage through the
town. It should be stressed in the Action Plan that all of
these measures will require the consent of neighbouring
authorities, which cannot be guaranteed, and that the
effectiveness of such measures in reducing lorry numbers is
variable. The measures will require additional investigation
before specific proposals can be submitted for approval.
This investigation will include
imposing
an environmental weight limit, including the scope and extent of
any limit, costs, timescales and consultation with neighbouring
and other affected councils."
The only substantial
recommendation is:
The Cabinet Member for Transport is
RECOMMENDED to support preparation of an
Air Quality Action Plan for Chipping Norton on the basis of
measures to reduce lorry movements through the town as the
principal action.
So there you have it folks.
We have gone full circle. Five years of bureaucratic delay and
muddle and not a single step further forward. After rejecting the
town's own proposal for a weight limit five years ago, the County
have now agreed that a weight limit is the only serious option. I
suppose we should be grateful for that but they still don't seem
really convinced that its practical. The report sounds less than
positive about it all. This is the ONLY recommendation and after
five years they still haven't got it sorted properly. Amazing...
The most straightforward
method of controlling heavy goods vehicles would be through the
imposition of an environmental weight limit through the town.
To be effective this would require advance warning and signing of
alternative routes. For A44 traffic this could use the
existing advisory route via Northleach, for traffic travelling to
Banbury via A361 there are no obvious alternatives and this would
need to be negotiated with the relevant neighbouring authorities.
A weight restriction is already in place on the parallel A3400
through Compton so this route would not be suitable. A
complicating factor to this is that the A44 is designated as the
national Primary Route between Oxford and Evesham. While
this does not preclude the imposition of a weight limit there
would be a contradiction if a restriction was placed, given that
Primary Routes are a major component of the National Lorry Route
Network. This would be likely to place a limit on the level
of compliance with any local restriction. Removal of Primary
Route status from the A44 would require the designation of an
alternative Oxford-Evesham Primary Route with the agreement of the
relevant highway authorities and government offices. There
would also be considerable cost given that this would require the
replacement of green backed signs with white ones – without which
the change in status would not be evident to drivers.
Enforcement is a considerable issue with any environmental weight
limit given that the general exception for access makes
identification of offending vehicles very difficult. This
would be particularly the case for a limit in Chipping Norton
where the alternative routes would represent a considerable
increase in both distance travelled and time taken.
And so they are recommending
yet more investigation and consultation before actually proposing
it to government. This makes any action years away! For goodness
sake Heathrow Terminal 5 was agreed faster than this. For myself I
think they are just having a laugh - at our expense. Nobody has
the slightest intention of doing anything about air quality in
Chippy! I think both councils (County and District) believe
that if the talking can be strung out long enough low emission or
even electric lorries and buses will have arrived and the problem
will disappear. So meantime carry on wheezing Chippy. Just don't
hold your breath. |
|
Air Quality
action plan approved |
|
West Oxfordshire District
Council’s Cabinet has endorsed a plan to improve air quality in
Chipping Norton. The plan will involve seeking approval to
de-trunk parts of the A44 so that heavy goods vehicles are
re-routed away from the town. The area
around Horsefair in Chipping Norton was declared an Air Quality
Management Area in 2005 because of the high levels of nitrogen
dioxide pollution caused largely by traffic and, in particular,
heavy goods vehicles. Further investigations followed and a
draft action plan was published outlining a number of options.
The Plan took into account any adverse impact each option might
have, such as transfer of pollution to other areas, increases in
noise or congestion or harm to the environment such as the
destruction of ecologically sensitive areas and habitats.
Earlier this year the public
gave their views on the options and a traffic management
proposal was produced by Oxfordshire County Council as the
Highways authority. The re-routing proposal includes changing
road signs and imposing vehicle weight limit restrictions on
traffic coming into Chipping Norton. Approval for this measure
is dependent on consultation with neighbouring authorities, as
the A44 signage crosses county boundaries and will impact on
several local authorities. Oxfordshire
County Council will also investigate whether introducing a low
emission zone in Chipping Norton will allow for better
enforcement of the restrictions.
Cllr David Harvey, Cabinet
Member for Environment said, “People living in Chipping Norton
have had to put up with the effects of heavy traffic for many
years and so we are pleased to be supporting this proposal.
We are concerned that in the long term it may not solve the air
quality problem. Because of this we are asking Oxfordshire
County Council to seek regional funding for a more significant
scheme. In the meantime we will continue to monitor air quality
levels.” |
|