|

"The current
'No Cuts' petition
in the town has to succeed"
- said our County Councillor Rob Evans on August 1st
A new hospital and older people’s home
for Chipping Norton’s future.
Summary – Cllr Rob Evans says
Chipping Norton has a
unique opportunity to create superb health facilities for the future. For
three years I have suggested joined up action on services between all the
town’s health providers. But let’s not rob Peter to pay Paul –by giving us a
brand new elderly people’s home joined to only two thirds of the services at
our Community Hospital. It is high time to develop our market towns as major
centres of services rather than outposts of far flung health empires. The
current ‘No Cuts’ petition in the town has to succeed and the PCT should
return to the September public meeting with firm agreements to keep minor
injuries, X Ray and maternity in Chipping Norton.
But we must be
realistic on how we secure future services for the longer rather than short
term.
Staying in the current hospital building is a maintenance drain on PCT
resources and may only keep services here for a short time. We should
welcome the prospect of a brand new building for both our hospital and
elderly people’s home whilst fighting for the full range of the
‘state-of-the art’ facilities we wish to see in it. Whether the site should
be Castle View or the London Road should be decided later - there is simply
not enough information on the finances, design or site values in the present
consultation.
Future generations will find it hard to forgive us if we do
not fight for the fullest range of health services jointly provided in a
brand new building for our community. The only alternative is complete
closure and loss of Castle View elderly home and uncertainty over the future
of the Hospital in its present building
Chipping Norton has a once in
a lifetime opportunity to secure superb health facilities for the future. I
have long advocated joined up action on services between the town’s health
providers. But this should not be done by robbing Peter to pay Paul –don’t
give us a brand new elderly people’s home alongside only two thirds of the
services we now have at our Community Hospital. Over 400 people at a recent
public meeting made it clear to Cherwell Vale PCT that we would not tolerate
a reduction in current services in a new hospital and elderly home
arrangement. Our local doctors make clear how minor injuries and X ray – two
services under threat – are integrated. The PCT have to realise that it is
wasteful both of patients’ time and their resources to have us travelling to
Witney, Oxford and Banbury for services and further clogging up
Oxfordshire’s roads. It is time to develop our market towns as major centres
of services rather than outposts of far flung health empires. The current
‘No Cuts’ petition in the town has to succeed and I understand the PCT will
return with more positive proposals to the further public meeting on
September 1st.
We must also be realistic
about how future services can be secured for the long rather than short or
medium term. Some services currently delivered in hospitals and elderly
homes will be provided directly in people’s own homes in future under
government care plans and we must get our share of local resources for this.
There is one factor that is
not being realistically faced up to in the hospital consultation so far -
the current and future maintenance costs of the Community Hospital building
that we so love. The PCT spend around £150,000 annually on the capital and
maintenance of the present building – that is 22% of the annual total
expenditure of £678,000 on our hospital. Last year they spent twice what
they expected on maintenance and in the next few years they need an
additional £175,000 to upgrade the building.[1] Their consultation document
states that the capital cost of operating in the building would ‘affect the
PCTs ability to extend services’. Staying in the current building will only
keep services for a short time in the town –and will clearly put them under
greater threat in another few years unless a new building is contemplated.
As a community we should
embrace the offer of a brand new building combining our hospital and elderly
home with open arms. Understandably there is considerable public anxiety
about which site will be selected and the private-public relationship of a
new build. In my view we should decide now on the principle of a new
building and the full range of the ‘state-of-the art’ facilities we wish to
see in it. We should then have a later and separate consultation on the
financial arrangements, design and siting of the building – leaving both the
options of the current Castle View and London Road sites equally open.
The government produced its
NHS Improvement Plan a few weeks ago. It pointed out that spending has
doubled in the last 7 yrs from £37bn to £67bn annually and that in future
80% of NHS funding will be through the PCTs.. To quote from the plan –
‘patient choice will be the key driver of the system and resources will flow
to those hospitals and other providers that are able to provide patients
with the high quality and responsive services they expect.’ [2]. We
certainly need our share of present and future PCT funding in Chipping
Norton. We are more likely to get those high quality and responsive services
in a new building than through a continuous struggle to modernise a
Community hospital nearly 100 years old.
The alternative is complete
closure and loss of Castle View elderly home and uncertainty over the future
of the Hospital in its present building. Future generations will find it
hard to forgive us if we do not fight for the fullest range of health
services jointly provided in a brand new building for our community.
Rob Evans
County Councillor
Chipping Norton Division. 1.08.04
Notes :
-
Cherwell
PCT Consultation Document ‘Improving Healthcare Provision in Chipping
Norton’ July 2004 and conversation with Jonathon Coombes PCT.
-
Department of Health, The
NHS Improvement Plan, Executive Summary, June 2004.
|