GEORGE HUMMER reviews the play.
As a thank-you to the Friends of The Theatre Chipping Norton for their
loyalty and assistance, the Director and the Council of Management offered
a free performance on 25 May. It was a generous gesture in any
circumstances, but to give such an outstanding gift was exceptionally
generous. The title gives it away: ‘Kafka’s Metamorphosis’, not
‘Metamorphosis’, certainly not ‘Ovid’s Metamorphoses’. If people in the
audience picked up that indicator, they quickly grasped what was being
offered on stage. If they didn’t, they stood the chance of being merely
‘blown away’ by the virtuosity and impact of the presentation by Black
Moon Theatre Company of New York. What a show!
Rene’ Migliaccio formed the company in order to explore a technique
that he calls Expressionistic Realism, to provide a ‘stylized, ritualistic
expression of reality’. To do this in Kafka’s Metamorphosis he used
actors who were also modern dancers live on stage as the three principal
characters, while in film extracts shown on a split screen he used
additional actors as well as the three principals. The play began with a
grotesque awakening of nearly naked Gregor Samsa, pale as a creature
released from under a stone, horribly metamorphosed into a giant insect.
No one had to explain, it was there in reality in the horrified face of
Gregor and his painful exploration of this disastrous alteration to his
body. Actual loathing and repugnance, balanced with sympathy for his
condition, held the audience locked in concentration; never has a Chippy
audience been so still and silent.
This opening was pure Kafka. Ovid’s poems described mythical situations
in which excesses and extremes of love took their own way, resulting in
the pleasure and wonder, and the occasional nasty surprise, of a
transformation in the name of love (with lust thrown in for good measure).
Kafka began his story with the transformation and worked forward to a
conclusion, making his readers reconstruct the circumstances that brought
this about and the reason why the result was so disastrous. Eric Pettigrew
gave us a Gregor whose transformation was seen in the end to be the final
phase of a spiritual strangulation by his family. It ended, as it had to,
with his elimination, like a vile beetle.
Gregor was the essential breadwinner of the family in order for his
father, who was not disposed to work, and nervous mother to remain in
their large flat. His sister had been designated the artistic one in the
family, and Gregor was expected to support her as well, while she
developed her talent as a violinist. No space was allowed for a life for
him, even for his identity. In a film sequence we saw and heard the father
disposing of what money Gregor had managed to save, while ruing not what
had happened to Gregor, but what had happened to the family. Had Gregor
ever said to himself, ignored and picked over by his father in the name of
the family, ‘Would they show me more consideration if I was a smelly,
disgusting beetle?’ Into this Freudian territory the interpretation dipped
a metaphorical toe, but no more.
The production unfolded at a consistently maintained, stately pace, its
highs and lows distinguished by music and light changes as much as by the
action on stage. The style of acting was equally stately, an intriguing
and effective blend of speechless reality and mime. The pivotal scene was
pure ballet as his sister and mother, both masked, fatally came to terms
with the hopelessness of Gregor’s affliction. The filmed sequences were
equally inventive; the quality of the film was grainy black-and-white,
sometimes faded and tinted, shot in expressionistic style and replete with
close-ups. But the camera angle was tilted off the vertical or horizontal
as if the film was shot urgently. The effect was to make filmed inserts as
vital to the action on stage as live action was, and to reinforce the
reality of the stylised performances both on stage and in film. It was
total vindication of Bertolt Brecht’s teachings regarding alienation, but
Migliaccio took the technique further with an impeccable multi-media
blend. (An unauthorised, hurried peek at the control desk revealed cue
sheets pages and pages in length for the two technicians who operated
lights, sound and film, with their hand-written notes and emendations
adapting their control panels to this theatre’s resources.)
The performance lasted an hour and ten minutes, and in that time it
never released its grip. Extraordinary theatre, extraordinarily powerful,
impeccably performed and produced. A night of theatre to remember.